Giving up beef will reduce carbon footprint more than cars
Study shows red meat dwarfs others for environmental impact, using 28 times more land and 11 times water for pork or chicken
by Damian Carrington
Beef’s environmental impact dwarfs that of other meat including chicken and pork, new research reveals, with one expert saying that eating less red meat would be a better way for people to cut carbon emissions than giving up their cars.
The heavy impact on the environment of meat production was known but the research shows a new scale and scope of damage, particularly for beef. The popular red meat requires 28 times more land to produce than pork or chicken, 11 times more water and results in five times more climate-warming emissions. When compared to staples like potatoes, wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme, requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse gases…
(read more: The Guardian UK)
photos: Shutterstock and Alamy
The folks at Zen Pencils have adapted this rare 1968 interview with Stanley Kubrick on the meaning of life in a lengthy comic.
Also see Zen Pencils’ comic adaptations of Charles Bukowski on the ideal conditions and myths of creativity and Bill Watterson’s advice, based on his spectacular commencement address on creative integrity.
La capacità della vescica urinaria umana è di 250/300 ml, ogni volta che la svuotiamo 10 litri di acqua pulita se ne vanno letteralmente nel cesso.
Il WC e la decadenza dell’impero occidentale, ovvero lo sciacquone come metafora della miseria umana.